I don't want to read a simple article or watch a simple voice over where I just get the who, what, where, and when. I want the why and the how. Everyone wants the why and the how. How unlikely was The Great Red Sox Collapse of 2011? Why did Terry Francona get fired? How did Gadaffi die? How did Arab Spring begin? Why did that crazy exotic animal owner in Ohio kill himself.? Why is it going to snow before Halloween? What good is knowing the facts without knowing how they got to be facts?
If journalists weren't curious, there would have been no Watergate. The course of American Politics and possibly the Cold War would have been forever altered. If journalists weren't curious, Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens would be baseball's biggest heroes instead of the sport's most hated men. There are countless stories out there, tremendously important stories, that would have went undiscovered without the presence of a journalist seeking more. The readers/viewers eat up those stories. The newspaper or televisions station will see a huge boom in ratings and readers. The journalist gets his or her 15 minutes of fame. The subject of the story gets their/its name out there, in a good way or bad. The positives are numerous, while the negatives of a curious journalist do not exist. Quite simply, to exist in this business, you must be curious
No comments:
Post a Comment